Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:18:32 +0300 From: Alexander Bubnov <alexander.bubnov@gmail.com> To: Hartmut Brandt <hartmut.brandt@dlr.de> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Harti Brandt <harti@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Poor situation with snmp support in FreeBSD Message-ID: <c3e287ff1003260118qec87635ie4c696c38cc27a3a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20100326081637.W46084@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> References: <4BAB5A77.7050505@mts.com.ua> <20100325142149.I44999@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> <c3e287ff1003252225g8aac72aod2ef2396c28175ee@mail.gmail.com> <20100326081637.W46084@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thanks a lot for your answers. 2010/3/26 Hartmut Brandt <hartmut.brandt@dlr.de> > On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, Alexander Bubnov wrote: > > AB>I am sorry may be I am going to ask often asked question... Why not to > AB>implement features which is lacking in net-snmp for FreeBSD instead of > AB>writing new snmp (bsnmp)? As a plus net-snmp has BSD like license. > > Many years ago I needed a small SNMP daemon for controlling some > equipment. I looked at ucd-snmp (that was the name than) but decided > against it because it was far too big. The even bigger problem was, that > it didn't care about handling errors in the places I looked at. I use > bsnmp alot in projects to do remote monitoring controlling of equipment - > you don't need SNMPv3 for them and it is easy to write a new MIB for > bsnmp. > > harti > -- /BR, Alexander
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?c3e287ff1003260118qec87635ie4c696c38cc27a3a>