Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 18 Oct 2016 15:48:57 +0100
From:      Matt Smith <matt.xtaz@gmail.com>
To:        Valeri Galtsev <galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu>
Cc:        Matthew Seaman <matthew@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: OFF TOPIC: pw add user slow
Message-ID:  <20161018144857.GA14240@xtaz.uk>
In-Reply-To: <32125.128.135.52.6.1476801176.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu>
References:  <fd1e578c-58ef-5098-9d89-c3db814d7af4@ifdnrg.com> <20161018074415.0f6575675db30d0b83d9b8ec@sohara.org> <60719.69.209.239.247.1476794773.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> <20161018140531.GA1080@lime.woodcruft.co.uk> <3ceed8a7-50dd-2fd5-d110-4a77e43f36ad@freebsd.org> <32125.128.135.52.6.1476801176.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Oct 18 09:32, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
>I have off topic question. Just the other day I got warning that dovecot
>port currently has no maintainer. I was so happy with dovecot for over one
>and a half decades, so switching to something else doesn't give me good
>feelings. Anybody knows any more details about dovecot port?
>
>Thanks a lot for your answers!
>
>Valeri
>

The mail/dovecot port has no maintainer. The mail/dovecot2 port is well 
maintained and regularly updated. If you are still running dovecot 1.x 
then you should definitely look at upgrading to 2.x instead. The 
configuration file format changed significantly between the two though 
so it would be best to start fresh and work out what to port from the 
old to the new.

-- 
Matt



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20161018144857.GA14240>