Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:32:57 -0500 From: Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com> To: "Glen Barber" <glen.j.barber@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Suitability question Message-ID: <18762.60345.260840.699344@jerusalem.litteratus.org> In-Reply-To: <4ad871310812181611j51800f4er1ec825d7422c41a2@mail.gmail.com> References: <494ABFDF.1020408@studsvik.com> <4ad871310812181346i2539ca78x2cd581f09dfa073d@mail.gmail.com> <20081219000729.GA5950@kokopelli.hydra> <4ad871310812181611j51800f4er1ec825d7422c41a2@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Glen Barber writes: > >> Word processing won't be a problem, but internet 'toys' like Flash > >> will be a problem, unless you use some wine+firefox workaround. > > > > What -- nspluginwrapper doesn't work any longer? > > From personal experience, nspluginwrapper is a memory hog, and > only supports Flash 7 (last I used it). Flash 9 + nsplugginwrapper works on -CURRENT starting about a month (I think) ago. Whether the necessary changes will appear in 7.1 I do not know. Robert Huff
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?18762.60345.260840.699344>