Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 19:29:02 +0300 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> To: Mark Felder <feld@feld.me> Cc: Andrey Chernov <ache@freebsd.org>, freebsd-security@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GOST in OPENSSL_BASE Message-ID: <20160711162902.GO46309@zxy.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <1468253073.695754.662984777.1E8F9C28@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <20160710133019.GD20831@zxy.spb.ru> <f35c1806-c06d-0d46-1c8a-58a56adef9a7@freebsd.org> <20160710150143.GK46309@zxy.spb.ru> <cb12083d-445a-ea19-5538-d670a89fcc6d@freebsd.org> <9ead7cd7-7d1b-2dd8-eea8-43f7766d92a9@freebsd.org> <d4329543-0503-cfc0-eb17-378d561d4c0f@freebsd.org> <20160711102906.GN46309@zxy.spb.ru> <1468253073.695754.662984777.1E8F9C28@webmail.messagingengine.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:04:33AM -0500, Mark Felder wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016, at 05:29, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > > > I.e. GOST will be available in openssl. > > Under BSD-like license. > > Can be this engine import in base system and enabled at time 1.1.0? > > And can be GOST enabled now? > > > > I think the wrong question is being asked here. Instead we need to focus > on decoupling openssl from base so this can all be handled by ports. This is wrong direction with current policy. ports: unsupported by FreeBSD core and securite team, no guaranted to comaptible between options and applications. base: supported by FreeBSD core and securite team, covered by CI, checked for forward and backward API and ABI compatibility.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160711162902.GO46309>