Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 18:18:23 -0400 From: Christopher Weimann <cweimann@k12hq.com> To: Andre Oppermann <oppermann@pipeline.ch> Cc: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>, Adrian Filipi-Martin <adrian@ubergeeks.com>, FreeBSD Hackers List <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: tuning a CPU bound server Message-ID: <20020522181822.A51741@mail.k12us.com> In-Reply-To: <3CEC0E35.26DBB385@pipeline.ch>; from oppermann@pipeline.ch on Wed, May 22, 2002 at 11:31:33PM %2B0200 References: <3CEC0E35.26DBB385@pipeline.ch>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 11:31:33PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote: > > > > But DJB does't maintain his code. I don't think it he has touched > > it in years. > > He maintains his code quite well. Thing is he only changes something > if there is something to change. In the case of qmail-1.03 this means > no change since 1998. Why? Simply because qmail-1.03 is essentially > bugfree and works perfectly for it's intended purpose. I know because > I spend the last five years writing and maintaining the qmail-ldap > add-on and know the qmail code inside-out. Actually once you get used > to it it's very nice and clean. > Not intended as a slight against DJB ( althought I do realize it looked that way ). I LOVE qmail, look at my headers. But DJB does not introduce any of Terry's "network effects". To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020522181822.A51741>