Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 13:16:06 +0400 From: Dennis Yusupoff <dyr@smartspb.net> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD network optimization project Message-ID: <52D651D6.8060605@smartspb.net> In-Reply-To: <1389771099.940290294.rj98b435@frv34.ukr.net> References: <CAH6gFOnczbNec6MS6nS1ed7z%2BmXL2BA0UN_vwHf3YbCHtpb2TA@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2BhQ2%2Bg7D6Su=C6XGcaUC6NuZbDKKQHXhO-4AWeatzmXi79tSA@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2BhQ2%2Bj2aBuGEY26yD%2BA6_8EUqY1Xhq4cFuZCL-YPn8TdPMPmA@mail.gmail.com> <CAH6gFOkdKoozLa=NYWsps4WFrvwnUh9COEuCkEv%2BxAiZ=r7O1Q@mail.gmail.com> <52D637E0.8070603@smartspb.net> <1389771099.940290294.rj98b435@frv34.ukr.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Currently? I thinks it's the only way. And please, remember about external ftp-proxy helper, which is far from ideal and should to be replaced or at least fixed for work in CGN cases. Moreover, we should to understand that coming time for CGN (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carrier-grade_NAT) to work from IPv6-only networks in IPv4 networks. I can't commit anything in FreeBSD, I haven't enough skills. Or was it sarcasm? 15.01.2014 11:38, wishmaster пишет: > from my point of view I think there is one solution from your words. I am about pf as NAT and dummynet as shaper. The pfSense uses own implementation of bundle of pf+dummynet. Ermal, my be time has come and you will commit this into FreeBSD HEAD? -- Best regards, Dennis Yusupoff, network engineer of Smart-Telecom ISP Russia, Saint-Petersburg
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?52D651D6.8060605>