Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 04 May 2016 12:12:04 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 209233] [patch] pthread_suspend_all_np races with check_suspend
Message-ID:  <bug-209233-16-1hGCyd2Ykt@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-209233-16@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-209233-16@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D209233

--- Comment #2 from Lawrence Esswood <le277@cam.ac.uk> ---
(In reply to Konstantin Belousov from comment #1)

This would end up doing the same thing in the suspend logic as always setti=
ng
the NEED_SUSPEND flag, as the !(thread->flags & THR_FLAGS_SUSPENDED) check
would always be true if THR_FLAGS_NEED_SUSPEND was clear and if we insisted
that !THR_FLAGS_NEED_SUSPEND =3D> !THR_FLAGS_SUSPENDED after a resume. The =
only
(observable) difference would be extra blocking in resume which we probabab=
ly
want to avoid.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-209233-16-1hGCyd2Ykt>