Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 18:28:11 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> To: "Brian F. Feldman" <green@FreeBSD.org> Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Testers wanted: reentrant resolver Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10402211822020.7870-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> In-Reply-To: <200402210253.i1L2r6rR035857@green.homeunix.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Brian F. Feldman wrote: > Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> wrote: > > > > Could you take a look at my test program (that I put in src/tools/) to see > > > if I made any pthreading errors? > > > > Where in src/tools? > > It's in src/tools/regression/gaithrstress. Yes, it looks fine to me. One other thing about your patch, probably minor. Since h_error is only used for the main thread now, multithreaded applications that haven't been recompiled will still be referencing it instead of the new function. This would seem to break the ABI, right? These older applications will pick up the wrong h_error. -- Dan Eischen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.10.10402211822020.7870-100000>