Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2001 20:22:09 +1100 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG>, Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org>, igorr@crosswinds.net, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Correct size of kinfo_proc Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0103072014420.1176-100000@besplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <9377.983896057@critter>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <3AA50F01.6560C34A@FreeBSD.org>, Maxim Sobolev writes:
> >Well, we are now well informed about this, could we just fix sys/sys/use=
r.h to match
> >relity (credit goes to phk for broking it and ignoring my posts complete=
ly)?
>=20
> I've been kind of waiting for -current to actually work again. I hate
> commiting to -current when it's b=F6rked.
>=20
> Yes, fix it in <sys/user.h> for now, or better, do the right thing
^^^^^ wrong
> with version numbers.
Version numbers would be essentially a regression to the way of doing
things before Kirk's changes. The size of the struct used to work
almost perfectly as a version number in practice, because changes
almost always bloat things.
Bruce
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0103072014420.1176-100000>