Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:45:04 -0700
From:      Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org>
To:        Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>
Cc:        marius@freebsd.org, gallatin@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org, np@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: NICs not in GENERIC
Message-ID:  <1DA65887-49B6-446D-AC31-67B149A6C736@samsco.org>
In-Reply-To: <20120221155656.Horde.kkqxT5jmRSRPQ7C4wSPK1kA@webmail.leidinger.net>
References:  <20120221155656.Horde.kkqxT5jmRSRPQ7C4wSPK1kA@webmail.leidinger.net>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail


On Feb 21, 2012, at 7:56 AM, Alexander Leidinger wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> is there a specific reason that the following NICs are not (or shall not be) in GENERIC (at least on i386)?
> - if_cas: is compiled as a module, Sun hardware, non-x86 only?
> - if_gem: is compiled as a module, Apple/Sun, non-x86 only?
> - if_hme: is compiled as a module, Sun hardware, non-x86 only?

If these aren't for i386 hardware, then why would they need to be in the i386 GENERIC profile?

Scott



help

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1DA65887-49B6-446D-AC31-67B149A6C736>