Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 18:51:12 -0600 (CST) From: James Wyatt <jwyatt@RWSystems.net> To: Mark Mayo <mark@vmunix.com> Cc: Gary Palmer <gpalmer@FreeBSD.ORG>, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Mail server setup Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9903131829570.29916-100000@kasie.rwsystems.net> In-Reply-To: <19990312015634.B6746@vmunix.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 12 Mar 1999, Mark Mayo wrote:
> up my thoughts as "I like the idea of network accessable storage - I
> just wish there was something better than NFS to do it with! Oh well,
> guess I'll have to use NFS, but do the application so that it actually
> works..". 8-)
Samba? 1/2 of a 8{)
We've found it to be better for our NT boxes to access than NFS (even
though Exceed's products and support are good).
Seriously, has anyone compared the performance of the two? Is anyone using
Samba for unix mounts? Is it a workstation toy or stronger than NFS? I
just know it works for our current use and I have been wondering if I
could do more with it... - Jy@
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9903131829570.29916-100000>