Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2019 20:32:54 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: haskell@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 236805] [NEW PORT] lang/elm: Delightful language for reliable webapps Message-ID: <bug-236805-16154-PnWHIlK7dC@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-236805-16154@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-236805-16154@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D236805 --- Comment #11 from Evilham <contact@evilham.com> --- (In reply to Gleb Popov from comment #10) Indeed it works without EXECUTABLES as well, it was a left over from having named the port elm-lang at first. I probably should have mentioned that I built the elm-lang.org website with= the binary package that was produced on poudriere as well as other sources and = it worked just fine. Meanwhile I was taking a look at elm-0.18, it looks like that was a bit of a mess with multiple binaries from multiple repositories and an awkward build chain, so it may not be worth the time investment right now. arrowd mentioned that switching in the future to a master port / slave ports for the different versions wouldn't be too problematic, so maybe it'd be OK= if we left lang/elm as the one and only elm port until a new version is releas= ed (which apparently can take anything from some months to some years) or some= one (could be future me in some months) does the work to get 0.18 to compile properly. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-236805-16154-PnWHIlK7dC>