Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 5 Nov 2001 14:40:59 -0500
From:      Michael Lucas <mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org>
To:        Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com>
Cc:        "stable@FreeBSD.ORG" <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: DIRPREFS revisited
Message-ID:  <20011105144059.A91828@blackhelicopters.org>
In-Reply-To: <3BE6E993.73F61814@tenebras.com>; from kudzu@tenebras.com on Mon, Nov 05, 2001 at 11:33:39AM -0800
References:  <3BE6E993.73F61814@tenebras.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Just 4.4-STABLE.

The only things that get merged into a -SECURITY branch are, as the
name suggests, security hole fixes.  Dirprefs is cool, but it doesn't
address any security issues.

On Mon, Nov 05, 2001 at 11:33:39AM -0800, Michael Sierchio wrote:
> 
> Apologies for asking at this late date, but are the DIRPREFS changes reflected
> in 4.4-SECURITY, or just 4.4-STABLE?  Thanks.
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

-- 
Michael Lucas
mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org
http://www.blackhelicopters.org/~mwlucas/
Big Scary Daemons: http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/q/Big_Scary_Daemons

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011105144059.A91828>