Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 16:19:48 -0500 From: Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org> To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/libsoup Makefile Message-ID: <20051224211948.GA63136@toxic.magnesium.net> In-Reply-To: <1135458317.64667.0.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> References: <200512241655.jBOGtVme037133@repoman.freebsd.org> <1135443852.77025.14.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20051224210134.GB58667@toxic.magnesium.net> <1135458317.64667.0.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> (12.24.2005 @ 1605 PST): Joe Marcus Clarke said, in 1.5K: <<
> On Sat, 2005-12-24 at 16:01 -0500, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> > >> (12.24.2005 @ 1204 PST): Joe Marcus Clarke said, in 1.0K: <<
> > > On Sat, 2005-12-24 at 16:55 +0000, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> > > > adamw 2005-12-24 16:55:31 UTC
> > > >
> > > > FreeBSD ports repository
> > > >
> > > > Modified files:
> > > > devel/libsoup Makefile
> > > > Log:
> > > > Add PTHREAD_CFLAGS/LIBS to CONFIGURE_ENV, and make LDFLAGS actually
> > > > be a part of CONFIGURE_ENV.
> > >
> > > You have to treat LDFLAGS specially because of OpenSSL. Also, we really
> > > need Ade to look into this libtool problem. We shouldn't have to hack
> > > all of these ports when it seems pretty clear the new libtool is at
> > > fault here.
> > >> end of "Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/libsoup Makefile" from Joe Marcus Clarke <<
> >
> > w0rd. I've backed it out and put LDFLAGS back where it belongs. Should
> > it be passed to CONFIGURE_ENV though?
>
> No. bsd.openssl.mk takes care of that for us.
>
> Joe
>> end of "Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/libsoup Makefile" from Joe Marcus Clarke <<
Hrmmn. I'm pretty sure that when I added ${PTHREAD_LIBS} to that
LDFLAGS line, it didn't get passed to configure. At least, the
build still failed anyway.
# Adam
--
Adam Weinberger
adamw@magnesium.net || adamw@FreeBSD.org
adamw@vectors.cx || adamw@gnome.org
http://www.vectors.cx
It's not stupid. It's "advanced." -- Almighty Tallest
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051224211948.GA63136>