Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 17:52:15 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com>, John Indra <john@office.naver.co.id>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is bad for me...) Message-ID: <200102130052.f1D0qFW33330@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "13 Feb 2001 01:48:33 %2B0100." <xzplmrbo1b2.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> References: <xzplmrbo1b2.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <xzppugno1jr.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <md5:A7E854B5C23FF2AEECF4F650019BBD3D> <3A887FAE.CF15C4BE@vigrid.com> <200102130046.f1D0klW33264@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <xzplmrbo1b2.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes: : Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> writes: : > I'd rather see this patch, or something similar, than bump the major : > version again. We can phase in a better way to obviate the need to do : > this in the future. : : Brian Feldman, Peter Wemm, David O'Brien and myself have been : discussing possible solutions on IRC for the past two hours. Peter : will likely commit a patch sometime soon. If there's something better than Daniel's solution that doesn't require a major bump and is compatible with the old libc.so.5 api, then I'm all for that. I'd love to test it out as well if there's any desire for that. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200102130052.f1D0qFW33330>