Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 13:44:08 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: 5.x discussions should migrate to freebsd-stable Message-ID: <20041105214408.GA32844@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <418B8CE3.9000000@freebsd.org> References: <418B8CE3.9000000@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--5vNYLRcllDrimb99 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 07:23:31AM -0700, Scott Long wrote: > All, >=20 > Now that 5.3 is about to be released (really, I mean it this time!) and > 5.x is considered -STABLE, further 5.x discussions and bug reports > should migrate over to the freebsd-stable mailing list. I know that > after 4+ years, there is probably a lot of sentimental attachment to > freebsd-current, and some of you probably have never seen a branch go > stable yet, but just like watching your kids graduate and go to college, > it's time to accept that our baby has grown up =3D-) >=20 > There are already a number of differences between the two branches that > make it hard to distill bug reports (ULE and GEOM, for example), so > this should be seen as a way to help continue to stabilize 5.x and also > get ready for 6.0. Ideally, developers should subscribe to -stable so that bug reports don't fall on deaf ears. Kris --5vNYLRcllDrimb99 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBi/QoWry0BWjoQKURAsy0AJ0ed9bvAczmjc/VM3kxJIYbyFpolgCeMdEo V0/65tPFkpjRv6NfmlQFLiA= =iw2k -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5vNYLRcllDrimb99--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041105214408.GA32844>