Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 10:05:08 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 222288] g_bio leak after zfs ABD commit Message-ID: <bug-222288-3630-h6NFFCxQDg@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-222288-3630@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-222288-3630@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D222288 Borja Marcos <borjam@sarenet.es> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |borjam@sarenet.es --- Comment #5 from Borja Marcos <borjam@sarenet.es> --- I've applied the second patch. Seems to be working fine, no leaks. Only one thing has me slightly puzzled, a very high used UMA slabs count. ITEM SIZE LIMIT USED FREE REQ FAIL SLEEP UMA Kegs: 384, 0, 242, 8, 242, 0, 0 UMA Zones: 4736, 0, 259, 0, 259, 0, 0 UMA Slabs: 80, 0, 542261, 39, 553319, 0, 0 UMA Hash: 256, 0, 60, 60, 109, 0, 0 The other server running Elasticsearch, which is still on 11.1-RELEASE and = has also 8 GB of memory, shows this. Note the high number of free UMA slabs. ITEM SIZE LIMIT USED FREE REQ FAIL SLEEP UMA Kegs: 384, 0, 240, 0, 240, 0, 0 UMA Zones: 2176, 0, 257, 0, 257, 0, 0 UMA Slabs: 80, 0, 207526, 243674, 2339176, 0, 0 I'll let it run for several days anyway. As I said it's not critical. Thanks! --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-222288-3630-h6NFFCxQDg>