Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 09:45:54 -0600 (MDT) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: silby@silby.com Cc: fjoe@samodelkin.net Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/sys mbuf.h src/sys/kern uipc_mbuf.c uipc_syscalls.c src/usr.bin/netstat mbuf.c src/lib/libc/sys sendfile.2 Message-ID: <20040618.094554.06947940.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20040618014912.O72823@odysseus.silby.com> References: <7071.208.178.23.220.1087509793.squirrel@208.178.23.220> <20040618063319.GB17749@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> <20040618014912.O72823@odysseus.silby.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <20040618014912.O72823@odysseus.silby.com>
Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> writes:
: My opinion is based on the fact that software in contrib/ and in ports/
: can change greatly from version to version, yet I'm getting attacked
: because I added a few lines of extra information to a utility.
Something else changed, therefore all change is fair game is not
logical. You are arguing to be right, rather than arguing for what's
right for the project. This little change isn't worth the push back
you are giving to the folks that rightly point out that it changes
things in -stable more than is traditional.
Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040618.094554.06947940.imp>