Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 22:41:54 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> To: John-Mark Gurney <gurney_j@resnet.uoregon.edu> Cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc/periodic/security 100.chksetuid Message-ID: <20050113204154.GA829@gothmog.gr> In-Reply-To: <20050113193413.GL19624@funkthat.com> References: <20050113153228.GG49329@submonkey.net> <200501131849.j0DInEEE029957@gw.catspoiler.org> <20050113185323.GI49329@submonkey.net> <20050113190755.GA24939@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> <20050113193413.GL19624@funkthat.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2005-01-13 11:34, John-Mark Gurney <gurney_j@resnet.uoregon.edu> wrote: > Giorgos Keramidas wrote this message on Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 21:07 +0200: > > > Sounds like something like chksetuid_exclude which lists mountpoints to > > > exclude might be in order. Any objections to me putting that together, > > > or are people happy with the status quo? > > > > It's not a bad idea. While you're at it, a knob that disables checks > > for NFS-mounted filesystems may be nice too. It doesn't make sense to > > check the same files both in the client *and* the server, as Don has > > pointed out. > > > > I think I can almost see this coming :-) > > > > daily_status_security_chksetuid_nfs="NO" > > Why not do something like: > daily_status_security_chksetuid_remote="NO" > > Find already has "logic" that tries to determin if an fs is local or > remote.. That sounds even better! :-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050113204154.GA829>