Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 08:10:35 -1000 From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> To: Matthias Buelow <mkb@incubus.de> Cc: Palle Girgensohn <girgen@pingpong.net> Subject: Re: background_fsck=no does not work? Message-ID: <17005.12955.757773.350868@roam.psg.com> References: <DD8197BD35BCC63A18AF62CB@palle.girgensohn.se> <426BA8FA.3080602@samsco.org> <426BAAE4.1040606@incubus.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> not always be clean. Softupdates (hopefully) means that it will be >> consistent and recoverable, but what you're seeing here is normal and > Why "hopefully"? Aren't people convinced that it works correctly? i am convinced, but some of the hosts seem not to be :-) i see shutdowns which 0 0 0 0 and then shut, and when restarted single user and fscked manually show errors. though i think this may be in current, which is on most of my hosts. randy
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?17005.12955.757773.350868>