Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 16:51:56 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Michael Proto <mike@jellydonut.org> Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Alex Kozlov <spam@rm-rf.kiev.ua>, Mikhail Teterin <mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com>, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: panic: kmem_malloc(16384): kmem_map too small: md-mounted /tmp filled up Message-ID: <20070227215155.GA57597@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <45E4A6D1.1020108@jellydonut.org> References: <200702271059.09230@aldan> <20070227210943.GA56889@xor.obsecurity.org> <200702271624.21474@aldan> <20070227212844.GA57256@xor.obsecurity.org> <45E4A6D1.1020108@jellydonut.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 04:46:57PM -0500, Michael Proto wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 04:24:21PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> >> The strings "panic" and "-o reserve" are mentioned in neither mdmfs(8) nor in
> >> rc.conf(5)... Is one supposed to look elsewhere?
> >
> > Yes, mdconfig, which is what creates the device (mdmfs is a legacy
> > wrapper for 4.x compatibility).
> >
>
> Isn't this backwards? mdconfig is the legacy-compatibility wrapper for
> mdmfs, not the other way around.
No.
DESCRIPTION
The mdmfs utility is designed to be a work-alike and look-alike of the
deprecated mount_mfs(8). The end result is essentially the same, but is
accomplished in a completely different way. The mdmfs utility configures
an md(4) disk using mdconfig(8), puts a UFS file system on it using
newfs(8), and mounts it using mount(8).
Kris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070227215155.GA57597>