Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 21:49:27 +0100 From: gregoryd.freebsd@free.fr To: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, d@delphij.net Subject: Re: SCHED_ULE trouble after ugrade 6.2-RELEASE -> 6.3-RELEASE Message-ID: <1202158167.47a77a572701f@imp.free.fr> In-Reply-To: <47A7749B.8070100@FreeBSD.org> References: <47A6D272.2000406@gmail.com> <47A6D420.5050700@delphij.net> <1202156029.47a771fda5d1c@imp.free.fr> <47A773AD.1010108@delphij.net> <47A7749B.8070100@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>: > Yes, there is no possibility of ULE 2.0 being merged to 6.x. Use it in > 6.x if you dare, just don't complain to us if it breaks your system :-) All right, I won't :-) > i.e. if at any point you start experiencing problems, do not report them > until you have verified that they persist with 4BSD also. I can hear you. Then again, I'm in the slow process of converting people in my office to use FreeBSD instead of GNU/Linux: it's not going to be easy if 6.3 4BSD exhibits slownesses when compiling a kernel, and 6.3 ULE might prove not that stable :-\ (I've not encountered any problem until now, though, and I'm "touching wood" as my granny says) By the way, why still include ULE in 6.x if it is to be avoided ? gregory
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1202158167.47a77a572701f>