Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 23:05:27 +0200 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Daniel Hartmeier <daniel@benzedrine.cx> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, Ari Suutari <ari@suutari.iki.fi>, freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Any ongoing effort to port /etc/rc.d/pf_boot, /etc/pf.boot.conf from NetBSD ? Message-ID: <86y7utgt0o.fsf@xps.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20060716182315.GC3240@insomnia.benzedrine.cx> (Daniel Hartmeier's message of "Sun, 16 Jul 2006 20:23:15 %2B0200") References: <44B7715E.8050906@suutari.iki.fi> <20060714154729.GA8616@psconsult.nl> <44B7D8B8.3090403@suutari.iki.fi> <20060716182315.GC3240@insomnia.benzedrine.cx>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Daniel Hartmeier <daniel@benzedrine.cx> writes: > Hence, a "default block" switch or compile time option _within_ pf is > not going to make any difference. Sure it will, if pf is compiled into the kernel or loaded by the BTX loader. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86y7utgt0o.fsf>