Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 11:04:29 -0700 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@FreeBSD.org> Cc: FreeBSD Current <current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: learned something about coretemp Message-ID: <472620AD.8070905@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <38C11A33-7BA8-46DF-A9DB-E7677DF41885@FreeBSD.org> References: <47241E9C.7000605@elischer.org> <e1309ba60710280720q53049b2q6b27754dff3bb6fd@mail.gmail.com> <472551FE.3020703@elischer.org> <38C11A33-7BA8-46DF-A9DB-E7677DF41885@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Rui Paulo wrote: > > On 29 Oct 2007, at 03:22, Julian Elischer wrote: > >> Rui Paulo wrote: >>> On 10/28/07, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> wrote: >>>> never kldload it on an 8 year old system. >>>> >>>> *bewm* >>>> >>>> I presume that my 8 YO inspiron 7500 doesn't have whatever is needed, >>>> but, "*Bewm*" is probably a less than optimal reaction. >>> That has been reported in the past. It's Intel's fault, not ours. >>> The spec says that if you issue a CPUID you should be able to tell if >>> the CPU has the temperature sensors regardless of the CPU model, but >>> on old systems these CPUID call "returns true". >> >> maybe we should just return true to part of the mail seems missing.. I think it went on something like: ...the startup routines for this module only of the cpu seems new enough. > > I'm sorry, but what do you mean? > > -- > Rui Paulo
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?472620AD.8070905>