Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 14:02:06 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: "Brian F. Feldman" <green@freebsd.org> Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kqueue giant-locking (&kq_Giant, locking) Message-ID: <200404171802.i3HI26T4026258@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <200404170513.i3H5DDgq033705@green.homeunix.org> References: <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <200404170447.i3H4l6Hn021993@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <200404170513.i3H5DDgq033705@green.homeunix.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 01:13:13 -0400, "Brian F. Feldman" <green@freebsd.org> said: > Contrived. Let's see one. There won't be any -- they will be using > threads, not kqueues, because threads work on more than one system. Except, of course, that the thread library may use kqueue internally. > In case > you didn't notice, kqueues have been horribly broken for years now For values of ``horribly broken'' apparently equal to ``not understood by green''. -GAWollman
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200404171802.i3HI26T4026258>