Date: 13 Feb 2001 02:04:14 +0100 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> Cc: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com>, John Indra <john@office.naver.co.id>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is bad for me...) Message-ID: <xzphf1zo0kx.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: Warner Losh's message of "Mon, 12 Feb 2001 17:52:15 -0700" References: <xzplmrbo1b2.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <xzppugno1jr.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <md5:A7E854B5C23FF2AEECF4F650019BBD3D> <3A887FAE.CF15C4BE@vigrid.com> <200102130046.f1D0klW33264@harmony.village.org> <200102130052.f1D0qFW33330@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> writes: > If there's something better than Daniel's solution that doesn't > require a major bump and is compatible with the old libc.so.5 api, > then I'm all for that. I'd love to test it out as well if there's any > desire for that. Yes, there is. Steal _cookie, rename it to _ext or something like that, and make it point to a separate structure that contains _cookie and the mutex. Optionally add a #define to avoid changing libc code that uses _cookie. That's not what Peter intends to commit, though. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzphf1zo0kx.fsf>