Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 2 Dec 1999 11:04:37 +0200 (SAT)
From:      Reinier Bezuidenhout <rbezuide@oskar.dev.nanoteq.co.za>
To:        bright@wintelcom.net (Alfred Perlstein)
Cc:        wilko@yedi.iaf.nl, groudier@club-internet.fr, FreeBSD-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, marcel@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Linux ioctl not implemented error
Message-ID:  <199912020904.LAA05726@oskar.dev.nanoteq.co.za>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.9912020043190.4557-100000@fw.wintelcom.net> from Alfred Perlstein at "Dec 2, 99 00:45:57 am"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > + {
> > +         u_char  channel0;
> > +         u_char  channel1;
> > +         u_char  channel2;
> > +         u_char  channel3;
> > + };
> > + 
> >   struct linux_cdrom_subchnl
> >   {
> >       u_char      cdsc_format;
> > ***************
> > *** 1232,1237 ****
> > --- 1240,1261 ----
> 
> FYI the kernel structures are completely identical, you don't really
> gain anything by doing this convertion.  Should this be put in for
> clarity?  I'm not sure.
> 

Ok ... I guess it should not be a problem the FreeBSD structure is

struct  ioc_vol
{
        u_char  vol[4]; /* one for each channel */
};

which I guess should look the same in memory than the linux one ...
The confersion is then not necessary ... ??

Reinier


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199912020904.LAA05726>