Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 11:34:29 -0600 (MDT) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: linimon@hub.freebsd.org Cc: rpaulo@fnop.net, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, netchild@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, phk@phk.freebsd.dk Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc Makefile sensorsd.conf src/etc/defaults rc.conf src/etc/rc.d Makefile sensorsd src/lib/libc/gen sysctl.3 src/sbin/sysctl sysctl.8 sysctl.c src/share/man/man5 rc.conf.5 src/share/man/man9 Makefile sensor_attach.9 src/sys/conf files ... Message-ID: <20071014.113429.1649777355.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20071014171922.GA61934@hub.freebsd.org> References: <A80979AB-DA0D-4D1E-B760-01E975916519@fnop.net> <89545.1192382078@critter.freebsd.dk> <20071014171922.GA61934@hub.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <20071014171922.GA61934@hub.freebsd.org> Mark Linimon <linimon@hub.freebsd.org> writes: : On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 05:14:38PM +0000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: : > To write some new code that works inside a sensible architectural : > framework that doesn't needlessly push tons of crap into the kernel. : : I have already written a protest to core about the tone, timing, and : public nature of your email. : : Since this is a) an architectural issue, and b) has already been made : inflammatory, I strongly suggest that the issue be handled by core@ and : not further argued on this mailing list. I didn't find phk's tone all that objectionable, and I also objected to the framework going in. We've certainly had much worse in the past. : I will not be following this discussion further, pending their intervention. I'll not be participating in that discussion, since I have very strong objections to the commit that were totally blown off. Now I have to go and look closely to see if any of them were silently corrected based on my feedback. Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071014.113429.1649777355.imp>