Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 15:00:37 +1200 (New Zealand Standard Time) From: Juha Saarinen <juha@saarinen.org> To: Makoto Matsushita <matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> Cc: "stable@FreeBSD.org" <stable@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: BIND in -stable Message-ID: <Pine.WNT.4.43.0205071457540.776-100000@den2> In-Reply-To: <20020507114514Q.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Makoto, On Tue, 7 May 2002, Makoto Matsushita wrote: > It's another story and not a scope of my interests. If BIND9 gets > enough maturity level for everybody's daily use, it would be a good > option for that. Seems OK here, but I admit that my installations aren't exactly heavy-duty. > But BIND9 is quite different from BIND8 (many existing features are > lost by some reasons); I'm afraid that BIND9 for 4-stable breaks POLA. Which existing features are you thinking of? I could be wrong, but my impression is that BIND 9 adds several features over BIND 8, not the other way round. -- Juha Saarinen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.WNT.4.43.0205071457540.776-100000>