Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 08:12:45 -0400 (EDT) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Review: change NGROUPS_MAX from 16 to 64 Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1011002081143.97485A-100000@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <20011002115206.M74839@sunbay.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > What's the reason why KI_NGROUPS should be different from NGROUPS_MAX? None -- ideally, they would be the same. I was reminding him that if he updated one, he should be sure to update the other. > On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 05:04:51PM -0400, Robert Watson wrote: > > > > Note this will break binary compatibility for xucred. Note also that this > > may have fascinating effects in NFS environments. Note also that you'll > > probably want to update KI_NGROUPS also. No idea if it will affect NIS. > > > > Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Project > > robert@fledge.watson.org NAI Labs, Safeport Network Services > > -- > Ruslan Ermilov Oracle Developer/DBA, > ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, > ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, > +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine > > http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve > http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.96L.1011002081143.97485A-100000>