Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 21 Mar 2008 22:38:59 -0500
From:      Paul Schmehl <pauls@utdallas.edu>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: List replies
Message-ID:  <9CA3D4489328B8E911387EE0@Macintosh.local>
In-Reply-To: <1206155440.6973.36.camel@laptop2.herveybayaustralia.com.au>
References:  <1206146157.6973.21.camel@laptop2.herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20080322015851.GA97121@owl.midgard.homeip.net> <1206155440.6973.36.camel@laptop2.herveybayaustralia.com.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--On March 22, 2008 1:10:40 PM +1000 Da Rock 
<rock_on_the_web@comcen.com.au> wrote:

>
> On Sat, 2008-03-22 at 02:58 +0100, Erik Trulsson wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 10:35:57AM +1000, Da Rock wrote:
>> > This may have been suggested or discussed before, but is there a
>> > reason why the reply-to on this list isn't the list itself instead of
>> > the person who posted? Ie reply-to: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>>
>> Because many people who ask questions here are not subscribed to the
>> list and thus would not see any answers that were sent only to the list.
>
> Well that certainly explains it, but it does surprise me. I thought
> you'd have to subscribe to post.
>

And *I* thought it was proper etiquette to only reply to the list.

Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu)
Senior Information Security Analyst
The University of Texas at Dallas
http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9CA3D4489328B8E911387EE0>