Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2004 11:37:14 -0800 From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> To: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org> Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern vfs_subr.c Message-ID: <41B211EA.6070807@root.org> In-Reply-To: <20041204075743.GL69608@elvis.mu.org> References: <20041203120940.5573116A515@hub.freebsd.org> <41B091E8.2060807@root.org> <20041204024212.K18185@mail.chesapeake.net> <20041204075743.GL69608@elvis.mu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net> [041203 23:42] wrote: > >>On Fri, 3 Dec 2004, Nate Lawson wrote: >> >> >>>I think that breaking vprint() into multiple lines is not a good idea. >>>Bruce pointed this out to me when I was doing the v_tag changes a while ago. >> >>What's the reason? > > > possibility of it being non-atomically written to the log files? > > -Alfred No, grep and general style considerations. At the risk of ruining the daemon discussion, I think it would be good to have a style(9printf). It would be good to have some more consistency about CaPs, etc. -- Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41B211EA.6070807>