Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 14 Mar 1999 20:57:04 -0500 (EST)
From:      Joseph Scott <joseph@randomnetworks.com>
To:        Andreas Klemm <andreas@klemm.gtn.com>
Cc:        Joseph Scott <joseph@randomnetworks.com>, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG, de-bsd-chat@DE.FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD 3.1 SMP outperforms SuSE 6.0 SMP by factor 2.3 !!!
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.10.9903142055560.20875-100000@sonic.digital-web.net>
In-Reply-To: <19990315020909.A1841@titan.klemm.gtn.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Mon, 15 Mar 1999, Andreas Klemm wrote:
> > 	Would it be possible for you to run the same tests with the 2.2
> > kernel?  I would think that regardless of the label ( "stable", "current",
> > etc ) the 2.2 kernel would be the one most people would put up against
> > FBSD 3.1
> 
> No, have no such system up and running. 3.1 is -STABLE now, 2.x is
> not supported anymore. And ... 2.x doesn't have SMP...

	Sorry, I should have been more specific, the LINUX 2.2 kernel, not
the FBSD one.
> 
> -- 
> Andreas Klemm                               http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~andreas
> News :  FreeBSD 3.1 SMP outperforms SuSE Linux 6.0 SMP by 230% !!!
> See  :  http://www.freebsd.org/~andreas/benches/index.html
>         http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~fsmp/SMP/akgraph-a/graph1.html
> 


Joseph Scott
joseph@randomnetworks.com




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9903142055560.20875-100000>