Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 11:59:22 -0700 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Matthias Andree <mandree@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ada(4) and ahci(4) quirk printing Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmo=F=P3BsmSn=OJVKtJtmF3zgFgbJSH3My%2BRgcHA3VHzZQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <51777887.4000908@FreeBSD.org> References: <20130422051452.GA2148@icarus.home.lan> <51763BF9.2000506@FreeBSD.org> <51777887.4000908@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I think this just outlines the problem - bootverbose is too verbose. eg, what the audio code outputs. And yes, net80211 when you're doing 11n. Adrian On 23 April 2013 23:15, Matthias Andree <mandree@freebsd.org> wrote: > Am 23.04.2013 09:44, schrieb Alexander Motin: > >> Let me disagree. bootverbose keeps dmesg readable for average user, >> while quirks are specific driver workarounds and their names may confuse >> more then really help. If every driver print its quirks, dmesg would be >> two times bigger. There is bootverbose for it. > > quirks print hardware shortcomings that FreeBSD is working around, it is > useful both to reassure users that FreeBSD is aware of the issues as > well as give them a hint not to buy the same hardware if the quirks have > too severe an impact (like NCQ unusable). > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-Vmo=F=P3BsmSn=OJVKtJtmF3zgFgbJSH3My%2BRgcHA3VHzZQ>