Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 11:49:23 -0500 From: Josh Paetzel <josh@tcbug.org> To: Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org>, Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: which way to update export_args structure? Message-ID: <1540226963.490541.1550623304.5D6A95A6@webmail.messagingengine.com> In-Reply-To: <20181022160508.GB45769@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> References: <YTOPR0101MB182021549F8CF8277477A4C5DDE90@YTOPR0101MB1820.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <20181003155133.GA57729@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> <YTOPR0101MB18207FF98DED0232B9BB1B4FDDE50@YTOPR0101MB1820.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <20181008170428.GB9766@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> <YTOPR0101MB11626B32F73B520FBDA3C633DDFA0@YTOPR0101MB1162.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <20181022160508.GB45769@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018, at 11:05 AM, Brooks Davis wrote: > > This is the direction I'd been thinking. FWIW, the usecase is more that > once you've moved away from the struct it's easy to make incremental > changes then to use a 32-bit mountd on a 64-bit kernel. Moving toward > size-independent interfaces helps both causes though. > > -- Brooks > Email had 1 attachment: > + signature.asc > 1k (application/pgp-signature) Brooks, What is the benefit or usecase for running a 32 bit mountd on a 64 bit kernel? -- Thanks, Josh Paetzel
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1540226963.490541.1550623304.5D6A95A6>