Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 17:08:53 +0400 From: Yar Tikhiy <yar@comp.chem.msu.su> To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Denis Shaposhnikov <dsh@vlink.ru>, Max Laier <max@love2party.net>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, bms@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: carp kernel trap Message-ID: <20060627130853.GA40621@comp.chem.msu.su> In-Reply-To: <20060627124651.GI86439@cell.sick.ru> References: <87fyhwf6z0.fsf@neva.vlink.ru> <20060627111334.GE36941@comp.chem.msu.su> <20060627155452.B87634@mp2.macomnet.net> <200606271415.26559.max@love2party.net> <8764imsrpa.fsf@neva.vlink.ru> <20060627124651.GI86439@cell.sick.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 04:46:51PM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 04:34:09PM +0400, Denis Shaposhnikov wrote: > D> >>>>> "Max" == Max Laier <max@love2party.net> writes: > D> > D> Max> Please try the attached patch and let me know if that fixes > D> Max> things for you. > D> > D> Thank you! It seems that it fixes the panic. I've successfully done > D> > D> # ifconfig fxp0 inet 10.10.14.8/24 > D> # ifconfig carp0 create > D> # ifconfig carp0 vhid 1 pass 12345678 10.10.14.4/24 > D> > D> It reports that fxp0 is in promiscuous mode. I don't know is it OK? > > This is OK for carp. ...but a possible to-do item is to program the reception filter in smart NICs so that they receive frames destined to the CARP unicast address(es) without having to go completely promiscuous. -- Yar
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060627130853.GA40621>