Date: 14 May 1998 07:13:06 -0500 From: Dave Marquardt <marquard@zilker.net> To: Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr> Cc: core@FreeBSD.ORG, net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: INRIA IPv6 on FreeBSD Message-ID: <85somdhwz1.fsf@localhost.zilker.net> In-Reply-To: Ollivier Robert's message of "Wed, 13 May 1998 00:58:24 %2B0200" References: <xzpra1z4ln3.fsf@yggdrasil.ifi.uio.no> <348.894984380@time.cdrom.com> <19980513005824.B17879@keltia.freenix.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr> writes: > According to Jordan K. Hubbard: > > discuss commonalities of implementation? As Garrett said, things > > which are pertinent to _both_ implementations would certainly be more > > than welcome at this time. > > If I remember well, there are at least two WIDE implementations, one > kernel-based and one using a user-mode daemon. I've not tried the WIDE ones > but the INRIA code is heavily used in France where FreeBSD is one of the > most used IPv6 platforms... > > FWIW IBM has chosen the INRIA as its IPv6 stack for AIX. Yes. At the time of the choice, WIDE wasn't really available yet, so it was INRIA vs. NRL. I sent another note that talked about how we ended up with INRIA rather than NRL. -Dave To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?85somdhwz1.fsf>