Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2024 07:17:51 -0800 From: John Kennedy <warlock@phouka.net> To: Kurt Jaeger <pi@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS problems since recently ? Message-ID: <ZZLXnskyjtn6OIyT@phouka1.phouka.net> In-Reply-To: <ZZK9tc-u0K5i2M_I@fc.opsec.eu> References: <ZZG0RdFTqfbfPwf7@fc.opsec.eu> <ZZH2YIXm75emBbpp@phouka1.phouka.net> <ZZIPYzWKZ1R_pMHQ@phouka1.phouka.net> <ZZJRHnA6Kgs3TdCF@fc.opsec.eu> <ZZLFQa1qZ0as01AU@phouka1.phouka.net> <ZZK9tc-u0K5i2M_I@fc.opsec.eu>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Mon, Jan 01, 2024 at 02:27:17PM +0100, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Do you have
> vfs.zfs.dmu_offset_next_sync=0
I didn't initially, I do now. Like I said, I haven't been following that one
100%. I know it isn't block-clone per say, so much as some underlying problem
it pokes with a pointy stick. Small chance multiplied by a bunch of ZFS IOPS.
Seems like I'd have to revert it all the way back to fresh install if I want
to get rid of all potential corruption unrelated to sysctl panic.
But I'll do myh busy-work cycle (*) with that one and maybe another with it
off and see what happens.
* full kernel+world, plus my local poudriere package build, currenly wedged
a bit with the heimdall build issue.
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ZZLXnskyjtn6OIyT>
