Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 21:14:44 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> To: Niclas Zeising <niclas.zeising@gmail.com> Cc: svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable-7@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r193040 - stable/7 Message-ID: <4A202614.7060609@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4A201AA4.2080106@gmail.com> References: <200905291442.n4TEg290077819@svn.freebsd.org> <4A2016DC.80001@gmail.com> <4A2018BA.9040305@freebsd.org> <4A201AA4.2080106@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 29/05/2009 20:25 Niclas Zeising said the following: > Andriy Gapon wrote: >> on 29/05/2009 20:09 Niclas Zeising said the following: >>> Is it possible to get something along this line in 8-CURRENT as well? I >>> accidentally removed btxld once and when I was building world it stopped >>> in sys/boot because it was missing. I had to manually build and install >>> it before i could continue with my buildworld, which was a bit annoying. >> >> Short answer: no, it was your fault :-) >> >> Long answer: possibly - there are a number of tools that are always used >> from /usr/obj (so to speak), but some other tools are used that way only >> if there is a good reason to do so. But I think that we could always use >> those latter tools from /usr/obj, I don't see why we couldn't. > > Obviously it was my fault, and had it bin cc or make I wouldn't have > complained, but it's such a small utility, I didn't even know it existed > or that it was needed... I was just asking, I apologize if I sounded a > bit angry in the previous mail. Oh, not at all. I started to wonder myself why such small tools couldn't always (unconditionally) be build-tools. Would save some hassle in cases like this. And I don't see any down-side. Anyone? -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A202614.7060609>