Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 11:12:42 +0200 (SAT) From: Reinier Bezuidenhout <rbezuide@oskar.dev.nanoteq.co.za> To: marcel@scc.nl (Marcel Moolenaar) Cc: bright@wintelcom.net, wilko@yedi.iaf.nl, groudier@club-internet.fr, FreeBSD-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Linux ioctl not implemented error Message-ID: <199912020912.LAA05956@oskar.dev.nanoteq.co.za> In-Reply-To: <384636CC.A184B6D0@scc.nl> from Marcel Moolenaar at "Dec 2, 99 10:07:24 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> >
> > > + if (!error) {
> > > + lvol = *lvolp;
> > > + lvol.channel0 = bsd_vol.vol[0];
> > > + lvol.channel1 = bsd_vol.vol[1];
> > > + lvol.channel2 = bsd_vol.vol[2];
> > > + lvol.channel3 = bsd_vol.vol[3];
> >
> > FYI the kernel structures are completely identical, you don't really
> > gain anything by doing this convertion. Should this be put in for
> > clarity? I'm not sure.
>
> No. When it's there, you automaticly assume it's there for a reason.
> Since the structures are identical, there's no reason for the code to be
> there. Very confusing :-)
I stand corrected then :) thanx
Reinier
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199912020912.LAA05956>