Date: Tue, 27 Jan 1998 13:00:59 -0700 From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: "SIVA SANKARAN" <SSANKARA.IN.oracle.com.ofcmail@in.oracle.com> Cc: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Benchmarks !! Message-ID: <199801272000.NAA06231@mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <199801270642.BAA29642@dwarpal.in.oracle.com> References: <199801270642.BAA29642@dwarpal.in.oracle.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I have currently finished porting JDK 114 on FreeBSD. Is there any > standard > benchmark, you guys are adopting for testing the JDK. I ran Caffeine3.0 > benchmark ( that is > supposed to be a standard benchmark), and got 210 as the result . > I ran it on a Pentium 133MHz , 32 MB RAM , FreeBSD-2.2.2 Release . Wow. That seems incredible, and almost unbelievable. >From a Solaris 2.6 box (Sun Sparc 5 @ 70Mhz, 128MB RAM), JDK1.1.5 from SUN 39 >From a Solaris 2.5.1 box (Sun Ultra 143Mhz, 128MB RAM), JDK1.1.5 from SUN 75 >From a FreeBSD 2.2.5-STABLE (PII-300, 128MB RAM), JDK1.1.5:java-port 224 >From a FreeBSD 2.2.5-STABLE (P-166, 64MB RAM), JDK1.1.5:java-port 103 ( I think , I forgot the numbers, but somewhere around there). >From a FreeBSD 2.2.5-STABLE (PII-300, 128MB RAM), Netscape 3.03 196 > > What I think is , we will adopt to a standard benchmark(Caffeine is a > good choice) and just compare our port performance. In case you have already > ran these tests, can you send the results, so that we can compare. How are you running the benchmark? I'm running them as % java CaffeineMarkApp, and then running all tests locally for the JDK versions, and via runtest.html for appletviewer/Netscape. Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199801272000.NAA06231>