Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 17:37:37 -0400 From: Mike Jakubik <mikej@rogers.com> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: stable@freebsd.org, re@freebsd.org, Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> Subject: Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk Message-ID: <444E96A1.3010307@rogers.com> In-Reply-To: <20060425211417.GA58948@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20060424181531.GA13774@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060425001751.S44618@woozle.rinet.ru> <20060424202859.GA18457@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060425004405.G44618@woozle.rinet.ru> <20060424205026.GA18844@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060425134418.J57625@woozle.rinet.ru> <20060425080932.1rv9hq0rcws4wc84@www.wolves.k12.mo.us> <20060425162656.GC54244@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060425213313.R71240@woozle.rinet.ru> <444E8E48.8040008@rogers.com> <20060425211417.GA58948@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kris Kennaway wrote: > This is true, but I hope you recognise that a good part of the > responsibility for this falls on the users when asked to test proposed > fixes. If the developers are not aware of remaining problems they > can't reasonably be expected to fix them :-) > Indeed, but the developers should also realize that a lot of users have servers in production and can not afford the downtime, or simply don't have the resources to test. I think the developers should also spend a little more time doing more extensive testing of their own code.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?444E96A1.3010307>