Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 21:16:39 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Edward_Tomasz_Napiera=C5=82a?= <trasz@FreeBSD.org> To: Matthew Macy <mmacy@nextbsd.org> Cc: Hans Petter Selasky <hps@selasky.org>, Oded Shanoon <odeds@mellanox.com>, Meny Yossefi <menyy@mellanox.com>, "freebsd-x11@freebsd.org" <freebsd-x11@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Enabling OFED by default. Message-ID: <7B5CD331-4C63-44BB-AAA8-13B5E497DBB7@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <155742f5696.10b23e0dc206113.7147700460165953862@nextbsd.org> References: <20160211205358.GA3567@brick.home> <56D811B3.6090406@selasky.org> <20160305155620.GB2512@brick.home> <56DC00EA.7050900@selasky.org> <20160523102055.GA2891@brick> <fc2630f9-dd10-5640-2ce2-a4a3feb6962a@selasky.org> <1556f5196ad.cc101c73136103.7671428586181101222@nextbsd.org> <36219e68-a6cd-de7c-f318-b6a65543a087@selasky.org> <155742f5696.10b23e0dc206113.7147700460165953862@nextbsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dnia 21.06.2016 o godz. 20:18 Matthew Macy <mmacy@nextbsd.org> napisa=C5=82(= a): >=20 >=20 >=20 > ---- On Tue, 21 Jun 2016 00:48:26 -0700 Hans Petter Selasky <hps@selasky.o= rg> wrote ----=20 >>> On 06/20/16 21:37, Matthew Macy wrote:=20 >>> Sorry, this got sorted in to spam.=20 >>>=20 >>> Do not enable in tree linuxkpi by default. It will definitely interfere w= ith out of tree graphics work, which would harm far far more users than it b= enefits.=20 >>>=20 >>> If anything GENERIC needs to be getting smaller. Please do not do this. I= t is an all around bad idea.=20 >>>=20 >>> -M >>=20 >> The final goal should be to make the DRM2 LinuxKPI an extension of the =20= >> kernel's LinuxKPI so that they can co-exist. >=20 > Sure. But that's not going to happen by 11 or probably even 11.1.=20 Well, in any case it would be too late to enable it in 11.0-RELEASE anyway.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7B5CD331-4C63-44BB-AAA8-13B5E497DBB7>