Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 12:40:16 +0800 From: Archimedes Gaviola <agaviola@infoweapons.com> To: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org> Cc: "freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org" <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Issue with multiple configured IPv6 prefixes in rtadvd.conf Message-ID: <4F4B0930.5040302@infoweapons.com> In-Reply-To: <20120227.131108.899978360503655703.hrs@allbsd.org> References: <4F4AEDBF.3000903@infoweapons.com> <20120227.131108.899978360503655703.hrs@allbsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2/27/2012 12:11 PM, Hiroki Sato wrote: > Archimedes Gaviola<agaviola@infoweapons.com> wrote > in<4F4AEDBF.3000903@infoweapons.com>: > > ag> Now, my observation is that there seems to be a problem with > ag> advertising two or perhaps more prefixes in the RA message. This has > ag> been tested in 7.x and the issues were the same. FreeBSD 4.11 behave > ag> the same as well. > ag> > ag> Is this a bug or limitation of the rtadvd design implementation? > > I am wondering where you got the notation ":addrs#1:" from. Please > try the following: > > em2:\ > :mtu#1400:\ > :addr0="3ffe:501:ffff:100::":prefixlen0#64:vltime0#12345:pltime0#12345:\ > :addr1="3ffe:501:ffff:101::":prefixlen1#64:vltime1#12345:pltime1#12345: > > -- Hiroki Hi Hiroki, I got that notation from here http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/network-ipv6.html. Okay, let me try you're recommendation. Thanks,
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F4B0930.5040302>