Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 11:38:13 -0600 From: Mark Felder <feld@feld.me> To: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: is csup broken? Message-ID: <20130102113813.2e9d42cf@tech304.office.supranet.net> In-Reply-To: <50E45B78.5040609@a1poweruser.com> References: <50E44EC9.6070301@a1poweruser.com> <20130102162025.d7ef8fd5.freebsd@edvax.de> <50E4539E.7050803@a1poweruser.com> <20130102164728.abc6cc34.freebsd@edvax.de> <50E45B78.5040609@a1poweruser.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 2 Jan 2013 11:08:24 -0500 fbsd8@a1poweruser.com wrote: > This 9.1 release was released prematurely. It has more problems > them 5.0 had which had a re-release 2 weeks later to fix problems. This is FUD. Stop being afraid of change. Users use portsnap Power users use svn There's no use trying to cover everyone's edge cases. You'll never keep = everyone happy. > Now I just had a port I maintain committed yesterday > and I have no way to test it to verify the port is working. Please don't commit ports to the ports tree if you have not tested them!
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130102113813.2e9d42cf>