Date: Sun, 24 Sep 1995 14:41:08 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: rgrimes@GndRsh.aac.dev.com (Rodney W. Grimes) Cc: fenner@parc.xerox.com, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kernel versions and config's rm -rf Message-ID: <199509242141.OAA03933@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <199509242134.OAA01414@GndRsh.aac.dev.com> from "Rodney W. Grimes" at Sep 24, 95 02:34:43 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Instead of "rm -rf", maybe config could just do "make clean; rm *.h Makefile",
> > to keep the "version" file around?
>
> I like this, it is far more appropriate than an rm -rf, but should be
> reduced even further to just ``make clean; rm *.h'' and the clean: target had
> better do the right things. No need to rm the Makefile, config is going
> to overwrite it anyway. I can see the reasoning for rm *.h, as config and
> or files{,.i386} may have changed and not rewrite all the same .h files :-(.
You are both forgetting minor issues.
Like vnode_if.c and syscalls.c.
Terry Lambert
terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199509242141.OAA03933>