Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 19 Apr 2018 10:21:30 -0500
From:      Kyle Evans <kevans@freebsd.org>
To:        Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
Cc:        "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@freebsd.org>, src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>,  svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r332773 - head/etc/rc.d
Message-ID:  <CACNAnaF6E1g5rh149THRUFu8_GqhSoiJ=qMBFNVZK5Sx10f5Zg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANCZdfrUzmokt8hDMz_ggcqVAp701-HHzc=_MymEAdxcUYQUog@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <201804191502.w3JF2sgQ051472@repo.freebsd.org> <201804191516.w3JFG99V066371@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> <CACNAnaFCmFY3nS2wZx=qzdzip1nQTzVO3hexiGP5WV43WrAZ5A@mail.gmail.com> <CANCZdfrUzmokt8hDMz_ggcqVAp701-HHzc=_MymEAdxcUYQUog@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 10:19 AM, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 9:17 AM, Kyle Evans <kevans@freebsd.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 10:16 AM, Rodney W. Grimes
>> <freebsd@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net> wrote:
>> >> Author: kevans
>> >> Date: Thu Apr 19 15:02:53 2018
>> >> New Revision: 332773
>> >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/332773
>> >>
>> >> Log:
>> >>   Fix ddb rc script
>> >>
>> >>   r288291 added a call to limits(1), which isn't available before
>> >> partitions
>> >>   are mounted. This broke the ddb rc script, which does not provide its
>> >> own
>> >>   start_cmd.
>> >>
>> >>   Alleviate the situation here by providing a start_cmd. We still have
>> >> other
>> >>   problems with diskless setups that need to be considered, but this is
>> >> a
>> >>   start.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Also didn't cy identify a second one of these?
>> > Or am I confusing yet another issue?
>> >
>>
>> He identified a second early script that didn't specify start_cmd, but
>> it was a non-issue because it's invoked independently of rc.subr.
>
>
> One would think that it shouldn't invoke limits at all if foo_limits= wasn't
> specified... Would make the feature much less invasive.
>

foo_limits was introduced long after the initial invocation, which was
introduced to enforce consistent limits of daemons run from rc.subr.
Not doing this due to the lack of foo_flags would certainly kill the
original intent, I'm afraid.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CACNAnaF6E1g5rh149THRUFu8_GqhSoiJ=qMBFNVZK5Sx10f5Zg>