Date: 19 Mar 2002 01:36:10 +0100 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org> Cc: bugbusters@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: PR state revision Message-ID: <xzpu1rdiebp.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <20020318162901.C27352@iguana.icir.org> References: <xzppu21jtq0.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20020318162901.C27352@iguana.icir.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org> writes: > the "suspended" by itself makes little sense, given that > nobody will deliberately put a PR in suspended state: > if anything, they will be moved to "closed" state. No; "suspended" is useful, and has been used for its intended purpose several times in the past. > I'd rather suggest to just put some code in the generation of > the list of PR's that flags entries whose status has not been > updated for a long time as "stalled" (and maybe showing > them in a different color on the web interface) so people > can be hinted on which entry to close. We do that already. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugbusters" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpu1rdiebp.fsf>