Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 22:13:44 +0000 From: Ben Smithurst <ben@FreeBSD.org> To: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu> Cc: doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: sigmask(2) MLINK? against sigsetmask(2)/sigblock(2) manpages... Message-ID: <20010105221344.R85794@strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20010105170640.B682@argon.firepipe.net> References: <20010104115943.F86630@argon.firepipe.net> <20010104174731.J85794@strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk> <20010104132137.H86630@argon.firepipe.net> <20010105210618.P85794@strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk> <20010105170640.B682@argon.firepipe.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Will Andrews wrote: > On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 09:06:18PM +0000, Ben Smithurst wrote: >> Thinking about it, the best solution might be to put sigblock, >> sigsetmask and sigmask all in one manpage with appropriate MLINKS. >> Something like this. > [...] > > Looks good to me. Since you're the doc committer here, you probably > should do this. ok, I'll see if anyone here has any objections first though. -- Ben Smithurst / ben@FreeBSD.org / PGP: 0x99392F7D To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010105221344.R85794>