Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 00:14:04 +0900 (JST) From: Yasuhito KAMINAGA <kaminaga@nat.gunma-ct.ac.jp> To: stephen@missouri.edu Cc: ctm-users@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Do you still need CTM? Message-ID: <20150820.001404.104049290.kaminaga@nat.gunma-ct.ac.jp> In-Reply-To: <55D40085.4010907@missouri.edu> References: <55D3E582.2030908@missouri.edu> <20150819.122822.193714783.kaminaga@nat.gunma-ct.ac.jp> <55D40085.4010907@missouri.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thank you Stephen kindly for the advice. Unfortunately, I'm now busy and have no time to try svn. If the majority of the subscribers of ctm-users agree to closing ctm and you believe it is the best way, then I respect the opinion. ***************** From: "Montgomery-Smith, Stephen" <stephen@missouri.edu> Subject: Re: Do you still need CTM? Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 04:05:26 +0000 Message-ID: <55D40085.4010907@missouri.edu> > Can you try to see if you can get svn to work? > > Another approach is that people could have a repository of svn at home, > and then create deltas at home, and bring that to work, either by > emailing it to themselves, or by taking it in on a flash drive. > > This can be achieved purely by using svnadmin dump (to create the > deltas) and svnadmin load (to apply the deltas). The current mkCTM and > ctm commands are merely wrappers to these commands when they handle > svn-cur. (Most of the overhead is packaging it into the CTM structure, > creating checksums, and compressing the data.) > > If this last approach is viable, I could provide a few more details of > how to do this - maybe write some simple script.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150820.001404.104049290.kaminaga>